Duke Energy operates at significant scale in the utilities: gas and electric sector, with an Impact500 score of 72.8 and a C grade in the current modeled research cycle. Its strongest modeled pillar is philanthropy, while future research will continue to test disclosure quality, implementation evidence, and outcomes against sector peers. For companies in this industry, transition planning, methane and emissions measurement, operational safety, and community resilience are central responsibility issues. The opportunities identified in this report are forward-looking practices, not findings of misconduct or evidence that a program is absent. Structural facts retain their source year, and readers should consult the evidence and document sections before using the profile for decisions.
Company overview
Business context and responsibility.
Duke Energy is a large utilities: gas and electric organization headquartered in Charlotte, NC. Founded in 1904, the company has developed through multiple business and market cycles into an enterprise serving energy production, infrastructure, and commercial and consumer demand. The organization reports approximately 28,798 employees and $31.8 billion in annual revenue in the structural dataset used for this profile. Its Fortune rank of 145 is retained with the published 2026 source year and should not be read as a current ranking. Its competitive position is supported by operating scale, infrastructure expertise, and long-duration capital planning. Operations of this scale typically span multiple regions, customer groups, suppliers, and regulatory environments, making consistent governance and performance measurement central to long-term strategy. From a corporate-responsibility perspective, the most material research questions concern transition planning, methane and emissions measurement, operational safety, and community resilience. Impact500 evaluates the company through environmental performance, financial responsibility, philanthropy, and ethics. The profile therefore emphasizes comparable disclosure, evidence of implementation, board and executive accountability, and year-over-year outcomes. Company-specific assertions remain linked to cited evidence; modeled indicators and sector-based research guidance are labeled separately until analyst verification is complete.
Executive leadership
Harry K. Sideris
Chief Executive Officer
Appointment year pending verification
Harry K. Sideris currently leads Duke Energy. Impact Horizon last checked this leadership record on 2026-08-22.
Fortune rank and leadership are displayed with their source year and latest review date. Expanded profiles may retain historical structural facts and modeled Impact Horizon responsibility values pending analyst review.
The published utilities: gas and electric cohort contains 22 companies with an average CSR score of 76.5. Comparisons emphasize disclosure quality, verified outcomes, and sector-specific operating risks.
Competitive position
Ranked #16 in its published peer group.
Duke Energy scores 3.7 points below its industry average and changed +1% in the latest cycle.
Industry benchmarks
Performance against published peers.
Environmental
74 vs 74.6
Philanthropy
79 vs 74.5
Ethics
70 vs 77.5
Financial responsibility
68 vs 79.4
White markers show the published industry average.
Opportunities for improvement
Forward-looking priorities.
These recommendations reflect sector best practices and research priorities. They are constructive opportunities, not claims that a program is absent or that current performance is deficient.
1
Publish measurable near- and long-term emissions-reduction milestones with progress reported against a consistent baseline.
2
Expand renewable-energy and lower-carbon investment while explaining capital allocation and transition assumptions.
3
Strengthen supplier and contractor standards for safety, labor practices, and environmental performance.
4
Increase community consultation and resilience investment in areas affected by major operations.
Strengths
Clear targets, consistently disclosed performance, and accountable executive ownership.
Watch areas
Continued reporting depth and independent validation remain material to future scores.
Industry context
76.5
Utilities: Gas and Electric average
Below sector average by 3.7 points
Key strengths
Published responsibility disclosures
Established enterprise governance
Sector-scale energy operations
Watch areas
Outcome evidence requires continued review
Modeled score pending source-level verification
Historical timeline
Score history and CSR milestones.
202168.3
Baseline research cycle established.
202268.6
+0.3 points from prior cycle.
202369.6
+1.0 points from prior cycle.
202470.7
+1.1 points from prior cycle.
202571.0
+0.3 points from prior cycle.
202672.0
+1.0 points from prior cycle.
CSR initiatives
Programs under review.
Insufficient public information available.
Impact Horizon analysis
Risk Analysis
Sector-relevant exposures for Duke Energy, interpreted against the current peer data. Inclusion is not evidence that an adverse event occurred and does not change the CSR score.
Risk profile: Elevated Risk
Analyst observation
Analyst Observations
Research-based interpretation of the current Impact Horizon dataset. These observations are analytical judgments, not company-reported facts.
AO-01
Major strength
Philanthropy is the strongest current pillar at 79.0. This is a comparative signal from the Impact Horizon dataset, not an external assurance opinion.
AO-02
Important gap
Financial responsibility is the lowest current pillar at 68.0 and is the clearest area for deeper source review.
AO-03
Trend
The latest published research cycle moved +1.0 points. The change describes the dataset and does not by itself establish causation.
AO-04
Industry context
Duke Energy ranks 16 of 22 Utilities: Gas and Electric companies and scores 3.7 points below the peer average.
AO-05
Area to monitor
Environmental Risk is the leading sector-relevant watch area in this profile. Its inclusion identifies research exposure, not a finding of misconduct.
AO-06
Potential opportunity
Publish measurable near- and long-term emissions-reduction milestones with progress reported against a consistent baseline.