Conagra Brands operates at significant scale in the food consumer products sector, with an Impact500 score of 77.5 and a C grade in the current modeled research cycle. Its strongest modeled pillar is environmental, while future research will continue to test disclosure quality, implementation evidence, and outcomes against sector peers. For companies in this industry, responsible sourcing, frontline work, product stewardship, packaging, and value-chain emissions are central responsibility issues. The opportunities identified in this report are forward-looking practices, not findings of misconduct or evidence that a program is absent. Structural facts retain their source year, and readers should consult the evidence and document sections before using the profile for decisions.
Company overview
Business context and responsibility.
Conagra Brands is a large food consumer products organization headquartered in Chicago, IL. Founded in 1919, the company has developed through multiple business and market cycles into an enterprise serving consumer, retail, wholesale, and supply-chain markets. The organization reports approximately 20,900 employees and $11.6 billion in annual revenue in the structural dataset used for this profile. Its Fortune rank of 381 is retained with the published 2026 source year and should not be read as a current ranking. Its competitive position is supported by brand reach, purchasing scale, distribution networks, and direct customer relationships. Operations of this scale typically span multiple regions, customer groups, suppliers, and regulatory environments, making consistent governance and performance measurement central to long-term strategy. From a corporate-responsibility perspective, the most material research questions concern responsible sourcing, frontline work, product stewardship, packaging, and value-chain emissions. Impact500 evaluates the company through environmental performance, financial responsibility, philanthropy, and ethics. The profile therefore emphasizes comparable disclosure, evidence of implementation, board and executive accountability, and year-over-year outcomes. Company-specific assertions remain linked to cited evidence; modeled indicators and sector-based research guidance are labeled separately until analyst verification is complete.
Executive leadership
Sean Connolly
Chief Executive Officer
Appointment year pending verification
Sean Connolly currently leads Conagra Brands. Impact Horizon last checked this leadership record on 2026-08-22.
Fortune rank and leadership are displayed with their source year and latest review date. Expanded profiles may retain historical structural facts and modeled Impact Horizon responsibility values pending analyst review.
The published food consumer products cohort contains 11 companies with an average CSR score of 77.7. Comparisons emphasize disclosure quality, verified outcomes, and sector-specific operating risks.
Competitive position
Ranked #5 in its published peer group.
Conagra Brands scores 0.2 points below its industry average and changed +1.1% in the latest cycle.
Industry benchmarks
Performance against published peers.
Environmental
90 vs 73.5
Philanthropy
67 vs 81.3
Ethics
64 vs 79.9
Financial responsibility
89 vs 76.1
White markers show the published industry average.
Opportunities for improvement
Forward-looking priorities.
These recommendations reflect sector best practices and research priorities. They are constructive opportunities, not claims that a program is absent or that current performance is deficient.
1
Expand supply-chain traceability and publish supplier labor, environmental, and remediation outcomes.
2
Set measurable targets for packaging, waste, product circularity, and value-chain emissions.
3
Strengthen frontline workforce development, scheduling, safety, and advancement reporting.
4
Align community investment with local needs and report multi-year outcomes rather than activity totals alone.
Strengths
Clear targets, consistently disclosed performance, and accountable executive ownership.
Watch areas
Continued reporting depth and independent validation remain material to future scores.
Industry context
77.7
Food Consumer Products average
Below sector average by 0.2 points
Key strengths
Published responsibility disclosures
Established enterprise governance
Sector-scale food, beverages & tobacco operations
Watch areas
Outcome evidence requires continued review
Modeled score pending source-level verification
Historical timeline
Score history and CSR milestones.
202173.0
Baseline research cycle established.
202273.3
+0.3 points from prior cycle.
202374.3
+1.0 points from prior cycle.
202475.4
+1.1 points from prior cycle.
202575.7
+0.3 points from prior cycle.
202676.8
+1.1 points from prior cycle.
CSR initiatives
Programs under review.
Insufficient public information available.
Impact Horizon analysis
Risk Analysis
Sector-relevant exposures for Conagra Brands, interpreted against the current peer data. Inclusion is not evidence that an adverse event occurred and does not change the CSR score.
Risk profile: High Risk
Analyst observation
Analyst Observations
Research-based interpretation of the current Impact Horizon dataset. These observations are analytical judgments, not company-reported facts.
AO-01
Major strength
Environmental is the strongest current pillar at 90.0. This is a comparative signal from the Impact Horizon dataset, not an external assurance opinion.
AO-02
Important gap
Ethics is the lowest current pillar at 64.0 and is the clearest area for deeper source review.
AO-03
Trend
The latest published research cycle moved +1.1 points. The change describes the dataset and does not by itself establish causation.
AO-04
Industry context
Conagra Brands ranks 5 of 11 Food Consumer Products companies and scores 0.2 points below the peer average.
AO-05
Area to monitor
Supply Chain Risk is the leading sector-relevant watch area in this profile. Its inclusion identifies research exposure, not a finding of misconduct.
AO-06
Potential opportunity
Expand supply-chain traceability and publish supplier labor, environmental, and remediation outcomes.